Hasselblad cameras. What to talk about them? Their excellence come from decades of engineering, and it’s certainly a polished product built with the best of the best in mind. Everything is good: the grip and body is built to last, the optical quality is better than Leica. The color science? Unmatched. The interface and menus are simple and straight to the point, the mobile app (Phocus 2) is the best I’ve seen (and I’m comparing with the Leica FOTOS, which I thought was the best), the company’s photography heritage is legendary, it is the camera that mankind brought to the moon for the first time!
But is it perfect? Well, we all know there’s no such thing, right?
Hasselblad has always been known for excellent user experience (UX) standards. Victor Hasselblad and his designs performed product design and UX practices way before it had a name! The V-system is shockingly well-designed, even the way the camera needs to be handheld was thought of.

If you don’t know what the V-system is, check out this live streaming episode:
Hasselblad V-System, explained
In this live stream, I invited my friend Brian Chambers to walk us through the legendary Hasselblad V System. Brian brought his collection to the table and demonstrated why these 50-year-old cameras still captivate photographers today. We explored the remarkable modularity of the 500CM, witnessed the magic of mounting a modern 100-megapixel digital back…
The V-system offer the perfect film shooting experience. But, did this experience is still there? Does Hasselblad still carry these excellent UX standards in their new product lineage? Are the new Hasselblad cameras, like the digital back and the X2D ii still on that high bar?
I recently got a 907x camera and a digital back (well. the digital back is the camera, the 907x is just an interface that connects the lens to it. That said, the considerations I will do in this post are most regarding the digital back and the 907x, but some of them might be applicable to the X2D system as well.

What did the Hasselblad world do to me
I got my first Hasselblad a couple of weeks ago, a film one, fully mechanical, the 503cw. Fully black, in Mint+ condition, with a waist-level viewfinder, acute matte screen D, the new film back, top-notch, best-in-class.
Over a month using it extensively, I built a list of things that Hasselblad can do better, a list that would make the 907x and the cfv100c perfect (at least to my taste). I compared with other high-end cameras and their features, like the Leica Q system, the Fuji GFX line, etc, along with decades of experience with my photography, as well as my experience in product design and UX.

My goal is that this post reaches Hasselblad, and hopefully they implement these in the future.
Let me enumerate them into titles, so it makes easy to dissect each aspect separately, I’m adding by order of severity (like how bad/annoying it is right now).
I know that probably Hasselblad’s product design team’s rationale was to keep things simple, and I appreciate that. Their cameras are the type of product that does one thing and does it well. That keeps the menus simple, and again, I appreciate it a lot, but some further customization and details could be added to make the cameras more to the photographer’s taste.

1. 907x rotary dial customization
By far, this is the biggest nonsense in the 907x system, and it almost looks deliberate that Hasselblad doesn’t care.
The 907x body has a rotary dial around the shutter button (1). That rotary dial changes the aperture when you operate the camera in Aperture Priority mode, or change the shutter speed when the camera is on Shutter Priority mode.
But when the camera is set to manual mode, the rotary dial changes the aperture that that’s it, and if you want to change the shutter speed, you have to operate it while holding a Fn button (2) on the right side of the camera.
This operation is slow and uncomfortable. This Fn (2) button should at least operate on “Toggle” mode, not “Hold”, meaning that you press it to alternate between the fixed functions of what the rotary dial does, because pressing a button and rotating a dial at the same time is just nuts.
If as least it changed the shutter speed by default, I could use the lens aperture ring (available on select XCD lenses [the most expensive ones only]) and have two tactile functions to change in parallel.
In addition, the user should be able to override what they want to do with the rotary dial in terms of clockwork/counterclockwork operation. This is currently not possible.
Big potential UX improvement with the rotary dial.

2. Haptic feedback (or beep) when horizontal
Hasselblad cameras are known for landscape photography due to their acuracy with perfect aligning the camera for shots.
Even when using the V-system and going full analog, you can have the option of having a crosshair on the focusing screen, to make sure the scene is perfectly aligned to whatever you want (horizon, sea level, antenna on top of building, etc.)
Their digital cameras offer something called “Spirit Level”, which is basically an electronic acelerometer that gives you a reading when the camera is leveled.
Turns out that when you are using the camera out in the sun, you can barely see the details on the LCD screen to check the electronic bubble level. If the camera had a feature to beep when it’s perfectly horizontal or vertical, it would be very sweet and make the life of landscape (or architecture) photographers a lot easier.
I think Apple does that with their camera app — when you have it fully horizontal, it gives you a haptic feedback. It doesn’t hurt, hardware is already there.

3. Instant leaf shutter upon XCD lens connect
The shutter on XCD lenses (and when using it with the V-system) is not in the camera body, but on the lens. They all feature a leaf shutter, which keeps closed until it’s shot time (as any other mechanical shutter).
Sometimes, we want to use the Electronic Shutter in the camera, and that comes with consequences, some bad ones.
(spoiler: the electronic shutter sucks and has INSANE AMOUNTS of rolling shutter)
The camera firmware should default to the lens’ leaf shutter when an XCD lens is attached. The user should opt-in for that feature. That would be neat.
I use the electronic shutter when I want to use my Leica lenses with adapters.

4. Customization of aperture ring direction
This one is very basic. The camera should allow the user to override the direction of what the aperture ring does. I would like to have the option to configure this in order to match the lens I am used to operate.

5. Customization of focus ring for P lenses
P lenses are the ones that only have one ring on it, and this ring controls the manual focus. That’s it.
I got shocked when I got a P lens and realized that I can’t rebind that ring on the lens to operate as the aperture ring, swapping what the ring does by the software in the camera.
C’mon, these lenses are all “fly by wire”, they are electronic, this rebind is obviously possible, it’s not like the lens ring is mechanically attached to helicoids or so.
Let us have multiple controls! Shutter speed on the rotary dial, and aperture on the P lenses!

6. No lossless compression on RAW files
This one wouldn’t hurt. There are lossless compresion algorithms that reduce file size without compromise. At the mark of 200 MB per RAW file with no compression, this requires the user to rethink the way storage is managed.
I know that medium format cameras aren’t for spraying and praying, I know. But here’s something Hasselblad didn’t think of when designing the CFV100c digital back: it doesn’t have IBIS, and by not having IBIS, photos might get camera shake, to eliminate that, guess what photographers do? They take 2, 3, 4 photos, for then to elect the less shaken one: that’s a Gigabyte there…
A lossless compression feature wouldn’t hurt, to reduce file size a little bit and help. They have HEIF as an option (at least in the CFV100c), but I’m unsure about the quality on these. If you do know, please let me know via comments.

7. Gyro AF lock
The Leica Q system showed me something I got fascinated, something incredible. It’s the gyro AF lock. A feature that I’ve only seen in the Leica Q cameras, and nowhere else.
It works like this: when you set a focus point and rearrange your angle to compose the shot, the camera uses the gyro information to make the focus point move to the point you locked.
The Hasselblad has a gyro in it, that’s how the virtual bubble level (or Spirit Level, as they call it) work. Nothing in terms of hardware stops them from implementing this gyro AF lock funcionality, so we don’t need to touch the LCD screen (or operate focus joysticks) all the time between shots.

8. Poor LCD control
When using the CFV digital back with a V-sytem camera, the screen pops up with a photo preview for each shot. I would really enjoy a way to turn that off and enjoy a full LCD-less experience when shooting with my vintage equipment — screen all black.
Also, the controls under the “Display” settings on the menu is ridiculously poor, like, all you can choose is Brightness, VRR (variable refresh rate), show and overexposure warning. When you plug the 907X, it gives you the option of disabling preview, but not when the back is used with a 500 system.
We don’t need a “Sony level” complexity here, but some more things like being able to shut off post-shot preview would be highly appreciated here.

Again, I know Hasselblad kept things simple, otherwise it becomes a Fujifilm menu, which requires entire dedicated YouTube channels (like Pal2Tech) just to explain where to find things. I know their intent is to make things simple and let photographer focus on photography and nothing else. I understand that, but I believe that all these small details would add agility to a system that is known for being slow. I hope Hasselblad folks read this post and apply these improvements!
In another post, I will tell the higlights of the X system (907x/cfv100c, or the “digital back”). I already wrote one, but that post was more to highlight the benefit of having a digital system that looks like analog, this next post I’m writing will focus on the highlights of the 907x as a purely digital ecosystem.
Please consider subscribing to Camera Clara for more articles right in your inbox! Quality over quantity, with the forever love for film photography and its techniques. With a paid subscription, you can shoot me a DM anytime, and we can arrange video calls where I can help you with your photograph needs, let’s be friends.








Rafa, congratulations for this extensive analysis of the 907X. As a previous owner of the 907X/CFV II 50C and now a proud owner of the 907X/CFV100C, I want to share my experience on some of the points you highlighted so well. Let's start:
When I got my first 907X, back in 2021, I immediately tumbled upon most of the details in your list. For instance, the lack of a separate dial for either shutter speed or aperture, depending of the mode you're in. To counter for that, I purchased the original Hasselblad grip, and that was a big mistake. It has, indeed, additional controls solving that one issue, but lacks in ergonomics. For instance, you can't hold the camera with your right hand comfortably wrapped around the grip and at the same time press the shutter button on top of it. For that and other reasons I ended up selling the whole package (that had grown meanwhile from the original 907X/CFV II 50C + the 45P/4 lens combo by adding the grip and the 80/1.9 monster). I was more than happy with the IQ of the files but decided to wait until Hasselblad fixed some of the issues.
Going back to issue #1, I totally agree: converting that button to a toggle function (aperture/shutter speed) would solve the issue, and it's a mere firmware mod that could come in a future update. Let's hope so. As I don't own any of the more expensive lenses (and don't intend to for now), this would be of great help.
Haptic feedback isn't probably possible for lack of hardware, but the beep is available, so again, just a firmware mod. Hey, Hasselblad, are you listening?
As I rarely use the CFV100C on my V-system backs, I hadn't noticed that the camera doesn't default to leaf shutter when an XCD is mounted. When using the CFV100C on legacy Hasselblad bodies one must choose from a list that starts with the 500 and ends with Any (in two variations, flash synchronization and electronic shutter). These two options are the ones you should use if you want Live View with legacy bodies. If you select a 500 body, for instance, you're bound to composing and focusing on, if you're lucky, an Acute Matte D through the optical path. You'll be able to see the finished photo later on the LCD, or immediately after the shot, according to a selection in the Display/Preview section. But I digress... It was only after reading this post that I noticed, as said above, that the camera doesn't default back to leaf shutter when mounting it to an XCD lens; you have to switch on the menu, which is a little cumbersome. Electronic shutter is fine for static subjects (for instance, if taking architecture photos on a FlexBody or an SWC); for everything else, leaf shutter is a must. Again, Hasselblad should read this post!
I don't have any of the more expensive lenses, so I'll pass on the customization of the rings on the lenses. I became used to the limitations of the 907X version and I'm happy with my current set.
Lossless compression should be a welcome addition to the RAW options, no doubt. 200MB files are huge and take up a lot of space in my Synology HDs!
The gyro thing is a great idea. I have other digital cameras with different approaches to subject focus lock but just locking on a certain point in the scene in front of it would definitely help.
As to the last item, I managed to get my LCD blank after each shot with my 500C/M body but it's a cumbersome process. I can take shots using just the focusing screen and treat the CFV100C as a film magazine but I don't see the point of a Hasselblad version of the Leica M-D digital bodies. I value being able to check immediately how the shot looks like in the LCD, so I can fix something on the spot.
All in all, Rafa, I can definitely sign at the bottom of your list of improvements, if you manage to get it to the guys at Hasselblad who can implement them. Do you participate in any Facebook group of Hasselblad addicts? I think that's one of the ways to get your list up to Hasselblad's decision circles.
Again, great review, and keep up with the excellent work here!
Rafa, check this group in Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1DXse4kCKc/